Wednesday, April 27, 2022

Could blocking or deleting a protein help prevent common oral cancers?

 he most common head and neck cancer—oral squamous cell carcinoma—often starts off, as many other cancers do, quite innocently. Perhaps as a little white patch in the mouth or a small red bump on the gums. Easy to ignore, to downplay. But then something changes, and the little blotch becomes more ominous, starts growing, burrowing into connective tissue.

Patients who are lucky enough to see a dentist before things take a nasty turn have a shot at being able to prevent the lesions from turning cancerous—or can at least make sure treatment starts when it’s most effective. But for those who aren’t that lucky, the outlook can be bleak: the five-year survival rate of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is around 66 percent. More than 10,000 Americans die of oral cancer every year; smokers and drinkers are hardest hit.

Now, researchers at Boston University’s Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine have found that dialing back—or even genetically deleting—a protein that seems to spur the cancer’s growth might help limit a tumor’s development and spread. They say their findings make the protein, an enzyme called lysine-specific demethylase 1, a potential “druggable target”—something that doctors could aim chemo and immuno-oncology therapies at to take down a tumor. The study was published in February in Molecular Cancer Research.

Given that at least one-third of Americans don’t visit a dentist regularly, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the discovery could be a future lifesaver for those who miss out on preventative care.

“These findings have significant implications for new and potentially more effective therapies for oral cancer patients,” says Manish V. Bais, a lead author on the study and SDM assistant professor of translational dental medicine. “This study is an important step toward the development of novel groundbreaking therapies to treat oral cancer.”

Maria Kukuruzinska, SDM’s associate dean for research and a coauthor on the study, says it was rare in the past for dental schools to be diving into the science behind head and neck cancers, with most of the research happening in cancer centers. But that’s changing and “dental schools have an advantage over traditional cancer centers when it comes to investigating the science behind the development of OSCC,” she says, “because we can get access to premalignant lesions, where cancer centers basically just see patients who are presenting with fully developed disease.”

Helping the Body Fight Back: Anti-Tumor Immunity

Once OSCC takes hold, says Bais, there’s little chance of eliminating it completely. Clinicians can try chemotherapy and radiotherapy, even cutting out a tumor. “But there is no cure—you can shrink the tumor, but not eliminate it,” Bais says.

In previous research, Bais had found that lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1)—an enzyme that typically plays a crucial role in normal cell and embryo development—goes out of control, or is “inappropriately upregulated,” in a range of cancers, including in the head and neck, as well as those in the brain, esophagus, liver, and lung.

“The expression of this enzyme goes up with each tumor stage,” says Bais, who’s also a member of BU’s Center for Multiscale & Translational Mechanobiology. “The worse the tumor, the higher the expression of this protein.”

In his lab, Bais began testing what would happen to tumors in the tongue if LSD1 was blocked. To restrict the enzyme, the researchers either knocked it out—by manipulating genes so LSD1 is effectively switched off—or used a type of drug called a small molecule inhibitor, which enters a cell and impedes its normal function. Already in clinical trials for treating other cancers, small molecule inhibitors haven’t previously been tested against oral cancer. Bais found that disrupting LSD1 curbed the tumor’s growth.

“The aggressiveness, or bad behavior, of the tumor went down,” he says. “We found that when we inhibit this protein, it promotes anti-tumor immunity—our body tries to fight by itself.”

But LSD1 isn’t the only troublemaker in the tumor: when it’s upregulated, it messes with a cell communication process—the Hippo signaling pathway-YAP—that normally helps control organ growth and tissue regeneration. Bais says YAP, LSD1, and a couple of other proteins then get stuck in a vicious cycle, each one pushing the other into increasingly aggressive and harmful moves. “We need to break this cycle,” says Bais.

To find a new way of doing that, the researchers coupled the effort to inhibit LSD1 by targeting YAP with a different inhibitor, a drug called verteporfin. Originally developed to help treat serious eye conditions like macular degeneration, verteporfin is being tested by other researchers as a potential cancer treatment, including in ovarian cancer. The combination proved effective, according to Bais. He also threw a third drug into the mix. Bais says using the LSD1 inhibitor in combination with a common immunotherapy drug that helps white blood cells in the immune system kill cancer cells—an immune checkpoint inhibitor called anti-Programmed Death 1 ligand antibody—“showed a favorable response.”

“Our findings provide a basis for future clinical studies based on the inhibition of LSD1, either as monotherapy or in combination with other agents to treat oral cancer in humans,” he says. The work was recently boosted with a new $2.6 million National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research grant. “Although our studies are preclinical, restricted to mice and some human tissue, we want to expand to look at human clinical trial samples.”

Predict Success in Humans

According to Kukuruzinska, Bais’ focus on the biology of oral cancer may also help make the development of other future treatments more efficient.

“People get very excited when you have a drug that may show some positive preliminary results, but very frequently, these studies move forward to humans, cost billions of dollars, and then eventually fail,” says Kukuruzinska, who’s also director of SDM’s predoctoral research program and a professor of translational dental medicine. “If you really understand what pathways, what cell processes are impacted by these inhibitors, then it allows you to predict in advance whether something is going to be successful in human patients.”

At BU, the dental school has a teaching clinic on site and shares a campus with the BU School of Medicine and its primary teaching hospital, Boston Medical Center. It’s also home to BU’s Head & Neck Cancer Program—which pairs basic science researchers with clinicians to look at the underlying mechanisms of oral cancers—and Center for Oral Diseases, a multidisciplinary clinical-research collaborative.

“So, we can think about disease interception,” says Kukuruzinska. “And perhaps think about preventing the tumor from happening.”

With access to a clinic—as well as head and neck surgeons from the neighboring hospital—researchers like Bais can test any new treatments and approaches on human tissue samples.

“It’s a holy grail,” Kukuruzinska says of the human samples. “We can interrogate them for responses to small molecule inhibitors, by capturing tumor slices and trying to treat them with different inhibitors to see the response.”

Eventually, it could also open the door to personalized, precision medicine, with researchers trialing different therapies on tissue from individual patients. “And then it will predict whether this person can be treated with this study,” says Kukuruzinska. “This is something we really want to develop.”

With students involved in many of the research projects—three were coauthors on Bais’ paper and another, Thabet Alhousami (SDM’22), was a lead author—it means future dentists produced at BU will head into the clinic with a sharper eye for potential malicious bumps and blotches.

“They will be able to say, ‘This is precancerous or cancerous’—it will impact their diagnoses,” says Bais. “Then, in terms of therapy, because they’re now aware of what can work, what immunotherapy can work, they can make specific reference to where patients should go next. It can improve the quality of diagnosis and treatment in the long term.”

Friday, April 22, 2022

Wearing dentures may affect a person’s nutrition

 Dentures may have a potentially negative impact on a person’s overall nutrition, according to new research from Regenstrief Institute and Indiana University School of Dentistry. The research team leveraged electronic dental and health records to gain a better understanding of how oral health treatments affect individuals’ overall health over time.  

This is believed to be the first study to report the results of utilizing lab values of nutritional biomarkers and linking them with dental records. 

“Dentures are a significant change for a person. They do not provide the same chewing efficiency, which may alter eating habits,” said senior author Thankam Thyvalikakath, DMD, MDS, PhD, director of the Regenstrief and IU School of Dentistry Dental Informatics program. “Dentists need to be aware of this and provide advice or a referral for nutrition counseling. These patients need support during the transition and possible continued monitoring.” 

For the study, the research team matched the dental records of more than 10,000 patients in Indiana with medical laboratory data, specifically markers for malnutrition. The laboratory tests included complete blood count, basic metabolic profile and lipid and thyroid panel tests, among others. They compared the lab results from two years before a patient received dentures to the two years after.  

Researchers found that people with dentures had a significant decline in certain nutrition markers over those two years. People who did not wear dentures did not experience this decline. The marker levels were still within normal range, but researchers say there is the potential that the levels will continue to fall as more time passes. They urge dentists to be aware of this possibility.   

The next steps in this research area are to look at other factors that may influence nutrition, including insurance status and dental clinic characteristics. 

Nutritional Assessment of Denture Wearers Using Matched Electronic Dental-Health Record Data” is published in the Journal of Prosthodontics. This study was funded through a grant from GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, UK. 

Dr. Thyvalikakath was the senior author, and Grace Felix Gomez, BDS, MPH, PhD of IU School of Dentistry and Regenstrief was the first author. Other authors are Sopanis D. Cho, DDS, MSD of IU School of Dentistry; Roshan Varghese, BDS, MBA of GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare; Divya Rajendran, BTech, M.D. of IU School of Medicine and Innovation Associates, Inc.; George J. Eckert, MAS of IU School of Medicine; Sruthi Surya Bhamidipalli, M.S. of IU School of Medicine; Theresa Gomez, DDS of IU School of Dentistry and Babar Ali Khan, M.D., M.S. of Regenstrief and IU School of Medicine.  

 About Thankam Thyvalikakath, DMD, MDS, PhD   

In addition to her role as a Regenstrief research scientist and director of the Regenstrief and IU School of Dentistry Dental Informatics program, Thankam Thyvalikakath, DMD, MDS, PhD, is the director of the dental informatics core, a professor at IU School of Dentistry and an adjunct associate professor in the IUPUI School of Informatics and Computing. 

About Regenstrief Institute   

Founded in 1969 in Indianapolis, the Regenstrief Institute is a local, national and global leader dedicated to a world where better information empowers people to end disease and realize true health. A key research partner to Indiana University, Regenstrief and its research scientists are responsible for a growing number of major healthcare innovations and studies. Examples range from the development of global health information technology standards that enable the use and interoperability of electronic health records to improving patient-physician communications, to creating models of care that inform practice and improve the lives of patients around the globe.  

Sam Regenstrief, a nationally successful entrepreneur from Connersville, Indiana, founded the institute with the goal of making healthcare more efficient and accessible for everyone. His vision continues to guide the institute’s research mission.  

About Indiana University School of Dentistry   

The only dental school in the Hoosier state, Indiana University School of Dentistry (IUSD) offers an extraordinary learning environment in which teaching, research and community service come together in the best way possible for the preparation of tomorrow’s dental professionals. About 80 percent of the dentists practicing in the state of Indiana are alumni of the school.  

Founded in 1879 in Indianapolis, IUSD is located on the health sciences campus of IUPUI, one of the outstanding urban universities in the United States with a recognized commitment to community engagement. IUSD capitalizes on the campus’s central location in the state and its position in the research corridor that links IUPUI, Purdue University West Lafayette, and Indiana University Bloomington. IUSD faculty conduct world-class interdisciplinary research in collaboration with the other IU health science schools and the Purdue Schools of Engineering and Technology and Science.  

About the Regenstrief-IU School of Dentistry Dental Informatics Program  

Established in 2019, the Regenstrief Institute-IU School of Dentistry Dental Informatics Program is one of only a few in the U.S., and perhaps the only one linked to a clinical data repository managed by a regional health information exchange. The program uses both electronic dental and medical record data for clinical research to develop interoperable databases and advance the knowledge of oral health problems that cause, co-occur with or result from medical conditions. The goal is to implement findings into dental clinics and other points of care. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 










Important step towards development of biological dental enamel


To this day, cavities and damage to enamel are repaired by dentists with the help of synthetic white filling materials. There is no natural alternative to this. But a new 3D model with human dental stem cells could change this in the future. The results of the research led by KU Leuven Professor Hugo Vankelecom and Professor Annelies Bronckaers from UHasselt have been published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

Our teeth are very important in everyday activities such as eating and speaking, as well as for our self-esteem and psychological well-being. There is relatively little known about human teeth. An important reason is that certain human dental stem cells, unlike those of rodents, are difficult to grow in the lab. That's why the KU Leuven team of Professor Hugo Vankelecom, in cooperation with UHasselt, developed a 3D research model with stem cells from the dental follicle, a membraneous tissue surrounding unerupted human teeth.

"The advantage of this type of 3D model is that it reliably reproduces the stem cells' original properties. We can recreate a small piece of our body in the lab, so to speak, and use it as a research model", says Professor Vankelecom. "By using dental stem cells, we can develop other dental cells with this model, such as ameloblasts that are responsible for enamel formation."

Biological filling material

Each day, our teeth are exposed to acids and sugars from food that can cause damage to our enamel. Enamel cannot regenerate, which makes an intervention by the dentist necessary. The latter has to fill any possible cavities with synthetic materials. "In our new model, we have managed to turn dental stem cells into ameloblasts that produce enamel components, which can eventually lead to biological enamel. That enamel could be used as a natural filling material to repair dental enamel, explains doctoral student Lara Hemeryck. "The advantage is that in this way, the physiology and function of the dental tissue is repaired naturally, while this is not the case for synthetic materials. Furthermore, there would be less risk of tooth necrosis, which can occur at the contact surface when using synthetic materials."

Impact in many sectors

Not only dentists would be able to help their patients with this biological filling material. The 3D cell model can have applications in other sectors as well. For example, it could help the food industry to examine the effect of particular food products on dental enamel, or toothpaste manufacturers to optimise protection and care. "In addition, we want to combine this model with other types of dental stem cells to develop still other tooth structures, and eventually an entire biological tooth. Now, we focused on ameloblasts, but our new model clearly opens up various possibilities for further research and countless applications", concludes Professor Vankelecom

Friday, April 8, 2022

Double-stranded RNA induces bone loss during gum disease



Illustrating the roles of TLR3 signaling in alveolar bone resorption. 

IMAGE: TLR3 SIGNALING ACTIVATED BY DS RNA [POLY(I:C)] ANALOGUE INDUCES THE PGE2-MEDIATED EXPRESSION OF RANKL THAT STIMULATES OSTEOCLAST FORMATION AND DIRECTLY PROLONGS THE LIFE SPAN OF MATURE OSTEOCLASTS, THAT WAS LEADING ALVEOLAR BONE RESORPTION IN PERIODONTAL DISEASE. view more 

CREDIT: MASAKI INADA, TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY

Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology researchers reported on a new discovery regarding the mechanisms for bone loss in gum disease (periodontitis). They found that double stranded RNA molecules can activate the immune system response that leads to deterioration of bone.

They published their paper in the March issue of Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Serious gum infections damage soft mouth tissues such as gums and gradually erode the underlying (alveolar) bones that support our teeth. Both the bone pockets around the base of teeth and the ligaments anchoring teeth to the jawbone are susceptible to getting broken away by bacterial infection. This periodontal bone erosion, gone unchecked, may finally result in tooth loss.

It has long been recognized that concentrations of bacterial plaque nestled in the tooth pockets are the cause of periodontal disease. The main components of outer membranes of the bacteria that cause gum disease are molecules called lipopolysaccharides. Lipopolysaccharides support the bacterial cell and protect against attack of immune cells, but have also been implicated in causing gum inflammation by switching on toll-like receptors (TLR4) on immune cells that then recognize the bacteria as pathogens.

However, until now it was unclear whether “other pathogens including double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) derived from bacteria or autologous cells contribute to the progression of periodontal bone loss,” explains study author and professor Masaki Inada, D.D.Sc and Ph.D. in the Department of Biotechnology and Life Science. For example, immune cells such as neutrophils accumulated in inflammatory tissues could release dsRNA in the mouth. The recent study investigated dsRNA as a suspect in the progression of bone inflammation during periodontal disease.

In healthy bones, stromal osteoblast on the outer surface of a bone lay down new bone material, while osteoclast originated from hematopoietic cells break down the old bone for resorption of minerals; the balance between their activities sustains bone mass. A protein called RANKL plays a role in maintaining that balance and, thus, in how bone gets successfully remodeled. The hormone-like PGE2 (prostaglandin E2) molecule, naturally produced by osteoblasts, upregulates RANKL during gum inflammation. Alterations in the production of PGE2, and therefore RANKL, would affect bone loss and gain.

Using osteoblasts and bone marrow cells from mice, plus a synthetic molecule analogous to dsRNA, the study authors experimented with exposure of the cells to dsRNA. They observed that the dsRNA clearly induced the differentiation of more osteoclasts, the cells that break down bone. The dsRNA caused osteoblasts to produce more of the hormone-like PGE2 that in turn upregulated RANKL and stimulated osteoclasts to differentiate. So, the osteoblasts, through interactions with the dsRNA molecules, sent cellular signals that increased the production of the bone-eroding osteoclasts. The dsRNA also made mature osteoclasts survive longer.

More, longer-surviving osteoclasts lead to more adsorption of bone when gums are inflamed from bacterial disease. The study revealed a previously unknown mechanism by which gum disease causes breakdown of bones. Says Inada, “These data suggest that TLR3 signaling in stromal osteoblast controls PGE2 production and induces the subsequent differentiation and survival of mature osteoclasts.” The stromal osteoclasts lead to inflammatory resorption of bones anchoring the teeth. Knowing that the inflammation leading to bone damage in periodontitis can be set off by dsRNA introduced via the bacteria or an accumulated immune cells in tissues is a leap forward in combatting the effects of gum disease.

Looking ahead, the researchers plan to further examine how dsRNA - by signaling immune system receptors on stromal osteoblasts to make more PGE2 - contributes to progression of periodontitis over time. Understanding the underlying mechanisms is the foundation for novel development of drugs to prevent bone loss from gum disease.

Other authors of the paper include Tsukasa Tominari, Miyuki Akita, Chiho Matsumoto, Michiko Hirata, Shosei Yoshinouchi, Yuki Tanaka, Kento Karouji, Yoshifumi Itoh, Takayuki Maruya, Chisato Miyaura, and Yukihiro Numabe.

The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science and the Institute of Global Innovation Research in Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology funded this research.

The paper, " Endosomal TLR3 signaling in stromal osteoblasts induces prostaglandin E2–mediated inflammatory periodontal bone resorption," was published in the Journal of Biological Chemistry in March, 2022, at DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101603

Thursday, April 7, 2022

Carbs, sugary foods may influence poor oral health

 The foods we eat on a regular basis influence the makeup of the bacteria -- both good and bad -- in our mouths. And researchers are finding that this collective of bacteria known as the oral microbiome likely plays a large role in our overall health, in addition to its previously known associations with tooth decay and periodontal disease.

Scientists from the University at Buffalo have shown how eating certain types of foods impacts the oral microbiome of postmenopausal women. They found that higher intake of sugary and high glycemic load foods -- like doughnuts and other baked goods, regular soft drinks, breads and non-fat yogurts -- may influence poor oral health and, perhaps, systemic health outcomes in older women due to the influence these foods have on the oral microbiome.

In a study in Scientific Reports, an open access journal from the publishers of Nature, the UB-led team investigated whether carbohydrates and sucrose, or table sugar, were associated with the diversity and composition of oral bacteria in a sample of 1,204 postmenopausal women using data from the Women's Health Initiative.

It is the first study to examine carbohydrate intake and the subgingival microbiome in a sample consisting exclusively of postmenopausal women. The study was unique in that the samples were taken from subgingival plaque, which occurs under the gums, rather than salivary bacteria.

"This is important because the oral bacteria involved in periodontal disease are primarily residing in the subgingival plaque," said study first author Amy Millen, PhD, associate professor of epidemiology and environmental health in UB's School of Public Health and Health Professions.

"Looking at measures of salivary bacteria might not tell us how oral bacteria relate to periodontal disease because we are not looking in the right environment within the mouth," she added.

The research team reported positive associations between total carbohydrates, glycemic load and sucrose and Streptococcus mutans, a contributor to tooth decay and some types of cardiovascular disease, a finding that confirms previous observations. But they also observed associations between carbohydrates and the oral microbiome that are not as well established.

The researchers observed Leptotrichia spp., which has been associated with gingivitis, a common gum disease, in some studies, to be positively associated with sugar intake. The other bacteria they identified as associated with carbohydrate intake or glycemic load have not been previously appreciated as contributing to periodontal disease in the literature or in this cohort of women, according to Millen.

"We examined these bacteria in relation to usual carbohydrate consumption in postmenopausal women across a wide variety of carbohydrate types: total carbohydrate intake, fiber intake, disaccharide intake, to simple sugar intake," Millen said. "No other study had examined the oral bacteria in relation to such a broad array of carbohydrate types in one cohort. We also looked at associations with glycemic load, which is not well studied in relation to the oral microbiome."

The key question now is what this all means for overall health, and that's not as easily understood just yet.

"As more studies are conducted looking at the oral microbiome using similar sequencing techniques and progression or development of periodontal disease over time, we might begin to make better inferences about how diet relates to the oral microbiome and periodontal disease," Millen said.


Story Source:

Materials provided by University at Buffalo. Original written by David Hill. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


Journal Reference:

  1. Amy E. Millen, Runda Dahhan, Jo L. Freudenheim, Kathleen M. Hovey, Lu Li, Daniel I. McSkimming, Chris A. Andrews, Michael J. Buck, Michael J. LaMonte, Keith L. Kirkwood, Yijun Sun, Vijaya Murugaiyan, Maria Tsompana, Jean Wactawski-Wende. Dietary carbohydrate intake is associated with the subgingival plaque oral microbiome abundance and diversity in a cohort of postmenopausal womenScientific Reports, 2022; 12 (1) DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06421-2

Patients reporting Penicillin allergy less likely to have successful dental implants

 

Dental implants are more than twice as likely to fail in people who report an allergy to penicillin and are given alternative antibiotics, compared to those given amoxicillin, a new study by researchers at NYU College of Dentistry shows.

 

The study, published in Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, is the first to examine the impact of prescribing antibiotics other than amoxicillin for dental implants.

 

Dental implants provide secure, long-term solutions for replacing missing or damaged teeth. A screw-like implant is surgically placed in the jawbone to act as a replacement tooth’s root and anchor the artificial tooth. The bone then fuses to the implant over several months, integrating it into the jaw.

 

While dental implants are largely successful, a small proportion of implants fail when the jawbone does not properly integrate the implant. This can happen for a variety of reasons, including infection, smoking, or injury to the tooth. To reduce the chance of infection, many dental providers prescribe amoxicillin—an antibiotic in the penicillin family—prior to and following implant surgery. If a patient reports an allergy to penicillin, alternative antibiotics can be prescribed.

 

Previous studies have shown that patients with a penicillin allergy experience higher rates of dental implant failure but have not looked at which antibiotics were used. To understand the outcomes of taking different antibiotics, NYU College of Dentistry researchers reviewed the charts of patients who received dental implants, documenting which antibiotics were given and whether their dental implant was successful or failed.

 

The sample included 838 patients—434 who reported having a penicillin allergy, as well as a random sample of 404 patients without the allergy. All patients without a penicillin allergy were given amoxicillin, while those who reported an allergy were given alternative antibiotics: clindamycin, azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, or metronidazole.

 

The researchers found that dental implants failed in 17.1% of patients who reported a penicillin allergy, compared to 8.4% of patients without an allergy. Patients who took certain antibiotics other than amoxicillin were much less likely to have successful dental implants; the failure rate for patients taking clindamycin was 19.9% and was 30.8% for azithromycin.

 

In addition, patients with an allergy to penicillin were more likely to experience earlier failure of their dental implant (less than 6 months) than those without an allergy (more than 12 months).

 

 

 

The reason why dental implants failed in patients with a penicillin allergy is unknown, the researchers write. It could be attributed to several factors, including reactions to the material used in implants or inefficacy of the alternative antibiotics.

 

However, research shows that penicillin allergies are overreported—90% of people who say they have penicillin allergies are not truly allergic to penicillin after testing. As a result, health experts recommend testing patients who report a penicillin allergy to confirm whether they are actually allergic.

 

“If a patient's actual allergy status is determined prior to oral surgery, we may be able to achieve more favorable outcomes by prescribing amoxicillin to those without a true allergy,” said Zahra Bagheri, DDS, clinical assistant professor in the Ashman Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry at NYU College of Dentistry and the study’s lead author.

 

"Although a growing body of evidence—at the research level—demonstrates links between oral and systemic conditions, the population still needs to know—at the consumer level—just how connected oral conditions, like the success of dental implants, are to systemic conditions, like allergies,” said Leena Palomo, DDS, chair of the Ashman Department of Periodontology and Implant Dentistry at NYU College of Dentistry. “This study highlights the importance of patients transmitting accurate, updated systemic health details to their dental care teams."

Tuesday, April 5, 2022

Dental anomalies among childhood cancer survivors differ according to type of anticancer treatment received



Dental Abnormalities 

IMAGE: LONG TERM DENTAL EFFECTS. (A) HYPOPLASIA IN THE FRONT UPPER AND LOWER TEETH OF A GIRL AGED 9 YEARS, TREATED FOR ALL AT AGE 3.5 YEARS. (B) MICRODONTIA SHOWING THE SECOND UPPER RIGHT PREMOLAR IN A GIRL OF12 YEARS, TREATED FOR NEUROBLASTOMA AT AGE 4 YEARS. (C) A PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPH OF A 12-YEAR-OLD BOY DIAGNOSED WITH BURKITT'S LYMPHOMA AT AGE 4 YEARS, REVEALING: C1. ALTERED ROOT DEVELOPMENT AT THE FIRST LOWER RIGHT MOLAR, C2. HYPODONTIA OF THE SECOND LOWER LEFT MOLAR. (D) RADIATION CARIES IN A 21-YEAR-OLD BOY TREATED FOR NEUROECTODERMAL TUMOR AT AGE 14 YEARS. view more 

CREDIT: ELINOR HALPERSON_HEBREW UNIVERSITY

The prevalence of dental developmental anomalies (DDA) in survivors of childhood cancer differ according to the type of cancer treatment administered, according to researchers at the Hebrew University (HU)-Hadassah School of Dental Medicine.

In a new study published in Scientific Reports, researchers assessed the prevalence of DDA among childhood cancer survivors according to types of treatment ─ chemotherapy, radiotherapy or surgery as well as disease type, and age during treatment. They found that combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy ─ particularly radiation to the head and neck area ─ indicated an increased DDA risk.  According to the study, the first signs of dental disturbances can be expected within one or two years of the anticancer treatment.

“Childhood cancer treatment is a success story of modern medicine,” shared HU’s Dr. Elinor Halperson. “Effective treatments are now available for previously untreatable diseases.  However, children seem to be particularly vulnerable to the harmful effects of radiotherapy and chemotherapy.  This growing population of child- and young adult- cancer survivors require considerable attention from the medical and dental community as we identify future risks,” she added.

The HU study population consisted of 121 individuals who received general annual examinations during 2017–2019, including full oro-dental examinations.  Researchers examined the records of patients who received anticancer treatment at HU-Hadassah’s Department of Pediatric Hematology–Oncology before age 18.

DDA was observed in nearly half the individuals (46%), in 9% of teeth. Anomalies were prevalent in 43% of those children who received chemotherapy without radiation, in 52% who also received radiotherapy, and in 60% of those who received head and neck radiotherapy. Patients who received only chemotherapy at six years or younger had a higher number of malformed teeth.  No specific chemotherapy agent was found to be associated with a higher risk for dental side effects (See Table 5).

Abnormalities included missing or small teeth, root development and enamel structure damage, over-retention of primary teeth; impaction; premature eruption; decreased temporomandibular joint (TMJ) mobility; inability to open the mouth or jaw and facial deformities.

The most significant differences between boys’ and girls’ dental anomalies were a higher incidence of microdontia among females and a greater prevalence for decayed teeth among males.

"This highlights the importance of dental care for individuals who received oncology treatment up to age six, particularly if it was combined with radiotherapy in the head or the neck region," Halperson explained.  "This kind of cross-sectional examination can be enhanced in large medical centers to identify the risks of adverse dental effects for specific treatments at particular stages of child development, and to establish international guidelines for follow-up and treatment."

The research team includes Dr. Vered Matalon, Dr. Karin Herzog, Dr. Avia Fux-Noy, Dr. Aviv Shmueli, Prof. Diana Ram, and Prof. Moti Moskovitz of the HU Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Hadassah Medical Center, and Dr. Gal Goldstein and Dr. Shirly Saieg Spilberg of HU’s Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatric Hematology.