Unless Dentists Know What They Are Doing
The research was led by corresponding author Dr. Amit Kumar of the Department of Public Health Dentistry, Santosh Dental College, Santosh Deemed to be University, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India. Many dentists have never managed a haemophilia patient and lack the training to do so safely, leading to treatment delays, inconsistent practices, and — in the worst cases — uncontrolled bleeding after procedures that could easily have been managed with proper preparation. A new mini-review published in The Open Medicine Journal, authored by Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Singh and Dr. Abhilasha Smith (Department of Dentistry, SMMH Government Medical College, Saharanpur), Dr. Ajit Vishwakarma (Department of Dentistry, Government Medical College, Azamgarh), and Dr. Meena Jain (Department of Public Health Dentistry, Santosh Dental College, Ghaziabad), pulls together the current evidence and clinical guidance on this topic with the aim of equipping dental professionals with what they need to manage these patients confidently and safely.
Why a Routine Extraction Is Anything But Routine for Patients Who Cannot Clot Properly
For most people, a tooth extraction or a deep cleaning is a minor inconvenience. For a patient with haemophilia — a hereditary condition in which the blood is missing one of the proteins it needs to form a clot — the same procedure can trigger prolonged, life-threatening bleeding. Haemophilia A, the more common form, affects approximately 1 in every 5,000 males worldwide and involves a deficiency of clotting factor VIII; haemophilia B is rarer and involves factor IX. Both types place patients at serious risk during any dental procedure that breaks the gum or bone tissue, and the oral cavity is a uniquely high-risk site because it is constantly exposed to saliva, chewing forces, and minor trauma.
From Clotting Factor Injections to Gene Therapy: What Dentists Need to Know Is Changing Fast
The review covers the full landscape of haemophilia management in dental practice, from the initial assessment all the way through to postoperative care, and makes clear that the field is no longer static. Before any invasive dental procedure — including extractions, deep scaling, or nerve blocks near vascular tissue — patients must be carefully assessed for their specific type of haemophilia, its severity (classified as mild, moderate, or severe based on residual clotting factor levels), and whether they have developed inhibitor antibodies that block the standard replacement therapy. The cornerstone of safe dental management remains clotting factor replacement before and after procedures, guided by a haematologist, and supported by local measures such as absorbable sutures, collagen-based or gelatin-based haemostatic sponges, fibrin sealants, and antifibrinolytic mouthwashes containing tranexamic acid. Crucially, the review also addresses a new generation of treatments — extended half-life clotting factor concentrates, bispecific antibody therapies such as emicizumab that mimic factor VIII activity, and early-stage gene therapies that may one day correct the underlying defect permanently — all of which alter how these patients respond to surgical bleeding and therefore change what the dental team needs to plan for. Dental lasers are also highlighted as a practical tool for minimizing soft tissue bleeding during procedures. The review includes a practical quick-reference clinical decision table covering pre-treatment assessment steps, procedure-specific management decisions, local haemostatic measures, drug prescribing rules, and postoperative instructions, designed to support dentists who do not regularly see these patients.
The Gap Between What Dentists Know and What Haemophilia Patients Need Must Close
The overarching message of this review is one of prevention over intervention — and communication over guesswork. Poor oral hygiene, driven largely by fear of bleeding during brushing and flossing, leaves haemophilia patients disproportionately vulnerable to tooth decay and gum disease, conditions that ultimately demand the very invasive procedures they are most at risk from. Breaking this cycle requires dentists who understand the condition well enough to perform regular, low-risk preventive care — check-ups, fluoride applications, fissure sealants — without defaulting to avoidance or unnecessary referral. For more invasive treatment, close collaboration between the dental team and the patient's haematologist is not optional; it is the foundation of safe care. Paracetamol, not aspirin or other anti-inflammatory drugs, must be the default analgesic choice, since the latter interfere with platelet function and increase bleeding risk. The authors acknowledge that this is a narrative review rather than a systematic one, which limits the strength of its conclusions, and call for more standardisoured clinical protocols and ongoing training for dental professionals.
Read the published article here: https://bit.ly/4p81hFu